Tuesday, July 01, 2008

Jeff on Form

There's something about the deadness of the prose and the banality of the sentiment - not to mention the fact that he doesn't actually explain that this is a gay wedding - that makes this a particularly fine Jeff post. You should all go and congratulate him at once.

12 comments:

  1. Excellent - a definite tang of Pooter about that one.

    For someone who has no grasp of storytelling, Archer has sold one hell of a lot of novels.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The gay wedding is implied there in the text, Bryan. It's subtle, I know, but my GCSE English Literature evening class has taught me to spot these nuances. Only the truly gifted writers can carry it off. I think he's also playing clever textual games with us. The unreliable narrator in this story doesn't tell us how he carried 10 ice creams. And I might be wrong but I think there’s something funny about his use of the word ‘punt’...

    ReplyDelete
  3. you're right about the punt, Dick - and Jeff is truly back on form with this one - not often you get to read such a detailed description of the purchase of 10 ice-creams. The master storyteller...

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think it's such a knowing 'punt', if you know what I mean, Nige.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes the execution was awful but the point was a good one (I speak as an inhabitant of the Gay capitol of Blighty), that we have moved on from section 28. And isn't it liberating--for all of us I mean.

    ReplyDelete
  6. ah, an opportunity for the old 99 gag, eh? unfortunately I feel sorry for the old dear....plus I've moved on from all that as well.

    but I bet he's had a few offers of ice-creams on her majesty's pleasure!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I visited his post via clicking on your link in RSS, Bryan, and felt sorry for him as there were no comments, so I left a comment asking him how he managed to carry 10 ice creams.

    Now I have returned to your blog and read your comment thread, I see that this question is a topic of hot debate! I will report back if JA or his ghostwriter answers his comment threads.
    I once read half a JA book. I see his prose skills have neither improved nor degenerated in the intervening 25 years.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Mind you there is something of the Harry Hutton spoof Johnsons in that blog address...

    ReplyDelete
  9. Perhaps they were chocolate ices... He could quite easily stack them.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hail Mary, mugger of Jeff, forgive him for he has sinned.

    ReplyDelete
  11. The anecdote is utterly fascinating. The effervescence of his prose -- his lightness of touch, his stylishness -- is redolent of Nabokov at his playful best.

    I count myself fortunate to have breathed the air of England in the same epoch as this giant of literature.

    ReplyDelete
  12. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete