Sunday, April 19, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
A blog about, among other things, imaginary ideas - What ifs? and Imagine thats. What if photographs looked nothing like what we see with our eyes? Imagine that the Berlin Wall had never come down. What if we were the punchline of an interminable joke? All contributions welcome.
Search This Blog
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(472)
-
▼
April
(45)
- Desert City Names
- NYT
- Against Accessibility
- Brit's View
- Ah-MEH-RikA, Ah-MEH-RikA
- English Heritage
- Brown Out: Yes We Can
- My Current Preoccupations
- On Breasts
- Torture
- Scruton on the Beach
- Rockets
- Swooper Brown
- Stewart and Colbert - I Begin to Get It
- Cars
- The British Library is Watching You
- Miami Blank
- The Wrong Book
- Nailing Balls
- Letter from America
- Lewis and Me
- Our Man in Miami
- Should Obese Passengers Pay More?
- Two Columns - Google and Damiangate
- Bed Bugs and Lurie
- The Delusions of the Italicised Left
- A Life Without Sex
- On Wine
- South Korea Stops Banks Buying Dollars
- Red Rag
- McBride-Rove: How to be Thick
- Damian McBride - Now Wash Your Hands
- Chris Hale's Blog
- Unintended Consequences
- For Evan Davis 2
- Guilt
- Pushkin
- Jade and Bourgeois Corruption
- Geoffrey Hill - the Shiver
- The Italian Earthquake
- Bill Nighy and Mark at Oxford
- Jade Goody Meets Russell Crowe
- Shrinking Phil
- On the Matter of Jeffrey
- Pointlessness and the Blot Man
-
▼
April
(45)
Now Balls and Draper are holed beneath the water, we should do all we can to eliminate the pernicious Kevin MacGuire, who is a one man Labour spin machine not so cunnningly disguised as a Political correspondent. He has been all over every broadcast news outlet today, trying to dampen down the Red Rag story and saying the Tories are really in a lot of bother too.
ReplyDeletesmearers smeared, could get messy.
ReplyDeleteSatan's house truly is divided against itself, all the demons bickering; and how can it stand?
ReplyDeleteNailed him for what? Is there anything in that story except unsubstantiated smears?
ReplyDeleteNot to defend Balls, or indeed comment on him at all, it's just that given the recent indignation over McBride surely we should all be primed to realise that this kind of thing is best ignored?
What a shame to see The Times throwing away journalistic integrity simply to stick the boot in.
So, Johnathan, are you saying the Balls story is a smear? That all of this is smearing? Why then did the PM apologise?
ReplyDelete