Thursday, February 19, 2009

The Symmetry of the Contemporary

Symmetry can be so satisfying. 'And yet when you see what technology is doing these days,' writes Andrew Sullivan, 'how can one stay too pessimistic?' Here's how. Yes, Facebook, Twitter etc. cause cancer, strokes, heart disease and dementia. As Christopher Ricks once said to me, 'What you give with one hand, you take away with the other.'

11 comments:

  1. What had you given him, and why did you take it back?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I revealed knowledge of his wife's occupation and then said I had just found it on the internet

    ReplyDelete
  3. From Ricks's Wiki entry:

    For Ricks, deconstructive technicians who effortlessly conduct such 'unmasking' operations discreetly wig themselves with the fig-leaves of a theory that vaunts a diplomatic immunity to the very order of prejudices otherwise discerned as intrinsically germinal to the art of literary creation itself.

    Two cheers and comedy klaxon honk-honk for Wikipedia.

    ReplyDelete
  4. why on earth would a dog wag its tail - what purpose could that have? no, from observation, it seems the tail is attempting to motivate the dog in every case.

    yes, I'm sure they said the same about telephones (and I'd agree). Despite what quantum mechanics tells us now, you can't break a jaw in Dallas without being in Dallas.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nevertheless,Ian, for instant corroboration see Bryan Appleyard’s excellentThe digital age is destroying us
    Stoooopid

    ReplyDelete
  6. What can be made of the fact that dogs invariably wag their tales on the way to the veterinary operative, standing at the ready, a brick in each hand, the sole purpose of which is to curtail the pooch's goolies .
    This raises another issue, who the hell thought up the phrase "the dogs bollocks" ?

    They are never symmetrical, goolies, are they?

    ReplyDelete
  7. They might even wag their tails.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It's not just the symmetry of the dog's bollocks I'd question.

    The Net and social networking through it has done some truly wondrous things for people across the globe, not least those older and younger people where geography and infirmity would previously have prevented full-on social interaction of great value to both sides. There is a dark side, of course. But when a man in a white coat is reported as saying that "evidence suggests" deep biological problems to boot my bullshit-alarm is primed to go off.

    Before he died Michael Crichton gave an outstanding presentation of how much doommongering during his lifetime turned out to be wholly without foundation. Watching it every month or so would be far more rational and cost-effective than a lot of our other attempts at stress relief. For through YouTube it's free every time. As I say, wondrous.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This Sigman fellow really is talking the most appalling twaddle, isn't he? God it's getting way, way beyond parody.

    The real cause of all of "cancer, strokes, heart disease and dementia" is, of course, not dying of something else first.

    ReplyDelete
  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  11. i think i get to have real conversations about once every 3 to 6 months; the rest of the time i exchange bland small talk with co-workers who do nothing but watch TV. i haven't watched TV since 2004 so i don't even recognise the title of most of the latest shows. If it weren't for the internet i would be reduced to creating imaginary friends and i don't reckon that would do anyone much good.

    ReplyDelete